Cancer biology is complex
Gleevec, Herceptin and Tagrisso succeed because they inhibit solo drivers. KRAS therapy will require intelligent combinations that will be tissue-specific.
Since the first approval in 2021, KRAS G12C inhibitors have shown moderate response rates and rapid emergence of resistance. Patient data shows why: KRAS is not a solo driver, and the pathways supporting it differ by tissue. KRAS therapy will require combinations chosen per tissue.
KRAS case study · by Pawel Zawadzki, PhD
Scientific success, commercial disappointment, clinical mediocrity
The first approval of sotorasib in 2021 was a turning point. Yet, KRAS inhibitors suffer from moderate response rates and the rapid emergence of resistance.
In 2024, sotorasib generated $350M in revenue. Not bad, but the hype was massive, and since 25% of all tumors carry a KRAS mutation, such a number is a disappointment.
KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes. However, KRAS is not a solo driver.
Gleevec, Herceptin and Tagrisso succeed because they inhibit solo drivers. KRAS therapy will require intelligent combinations that will be tissue-specific.
The pathways supporting KRAS in different tissues are visible in patient data. Just take a look and design the appropriate treatment for your product. This will also assess the size of the commercial opportunity for your product.
G12C inhibitors confirmed what patient data shows. Co-deregulated pathways drive intrinsic resistance. Drug combinations are a necessity.
Assess the commercial opportunity for your product in combo settings in different tissues before you enter clinical trials.
There's a common misconception that clinical trials are required to assess response rates. Treatment-naive patient data can actually identify factors that limit clinical response before any patients are dosed.
Medicines intended to work in patients should be developed with patient data in mind.